Greenland Technologies vs Taylor Devices
GTEC and TAYD side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GTEC and TAYD compare
Taylor Devices is the larger company, worth 14 times as much as Greenland Technologies ($188M against $13.3M).
Greenland Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (20.9% versus −12.5% for Taylor Devices).
Taylor Devices keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.5% compared with 12.1% at Greenland Technologies.
Greenland Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 12 for Taylor Devices), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GTEC | TAYD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $13.3M | $188M |
| Share price | $0.502 | $58.25 |
| Change, 1 year | −53.9% | 19.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −94.9% | 407% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.57 | 0.59 |
| Employees | 15 | 135 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 1.0× | – |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 4.8× |
| P/B | 0.1× (better) | 2.6× |
| EV/EBITDA | −1.9× | 27.1× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 15.5× |
| PEG | 0.01 | – |
| FCF yield | −7.1% | 6.4% (better) |
| Fair value | $7.52 | $39.70 |
| Margin of safety | 93.3% (better) | −46.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 20.9% (better) | −12.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 6.3% | 13.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −10.7% (better) | −23.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −51.0% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −14.3% | 54.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 33.7% | 41.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 17.3% (better) | 13.2% |
| Net margin | 12.1% | 17.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.91% | 31.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 14.8% (better) | 9.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 32.3% (better) | 19.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.03 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −2.28 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.97 | 8.66 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.07 | 17.56 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | 36.7% | – |
| Buyback yield | – | −1.0% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% (better) | −1.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 1.7% | 46.3% |
| Held by insiders | 22.7% | 2.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$897K |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.60% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- GTEC stock overview
- GTEC income statement
- GTEC valuation and score
- TAYD stock overview
- TAYD income statement
- TAYD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.