Gran Tierra Energy vs Vermilion Energy
GTE and VET side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GTE and VET compare
Vermilion Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.1% versus 7.1% for Gran Tierra Energy).
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GTE | VET |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $335M | – |
| Share price | $9.47 | $10.99 |
| Change, 1 year | 113% | 24.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 24.7% | 18.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.54 | 0.49 |
| Employees | 406 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 1 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.5× | – |
| P/B | 3.7× | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.1% | 14.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 20.2% (better) | 9.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | −42.3% | – |
| Return on equity | −122% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 6.53 | – |
| Current ratio | 0.46 | – |
| Altman Z-score | −0.74 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Years of dividend growth | – | 3 |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 64.8% | 55.9% |
| Held by insiders | 8.6% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$36.4M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.8% | – |
Go deeper
- GTE stock overview
- GTE income statement
- GTE valuation and score
- VET stock overview
- VET income statement
- VET valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.