Goodyear Tire & Rubber vs Newell Brands
GT and NWL side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GT and NWL compare
Newell Brands is the larger company, worth 2.1 times as much as Goodyear Tire & Rubber ($2.5B against $1.2B).
Newell Brands grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.79% versus −3.9% for Goodyear Tire & Rubber).
Goodyear Tire & Rubber keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −3.3% compared with −4.4% at Newell Brands.
Newell Brands pays a dividend yielding 4.8%; Goodyear Tire & Rubber does not pay one.
Newell Brands scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for Goodyear Tire & Rubber), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GT | NWL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.2B | $2.5B |
| Share price | $4.12 | $5.78 |
| Change, 1 year | −46.7% | 72.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −81.1% | −74.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.31 | 1.20 |
| Employees | 63K | 22K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.3× |
| P/B | 0.5× (better) | 1.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 8.0× (better) | 18.0× |
| P/FCF | 13.2× (better) | 46.5× |
| FCF yield | 7.6% (better) | 2.2% |
| Fair value | $13.02 | $5.67 |
| Margin of safety | 68.3% (better) | −1.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.9% | 0.79% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.2% (better) | −5.2% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 17.8% | 35.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | – | 0.98% |
| Net margin | −3.3% (better) | −4.4% |
| FCF margin | 0.51% | 0.72% (better) |
| Return on equity | −20.8% | −12.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 0.81% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 2.80 | 2.05 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.62 (better) | 11.58 |
| Current ratio | 1.12 | 1.27 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.25 (better) | 0.53 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 4.8% (better) |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −21.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 4.8% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 93.9% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 0.74% | 1.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 (better) | −$1.9M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 19.7% | 9.4% |
Go deeper
- GT stock overview
- GT income statement
- GT valuation and score
- NWL stock overview
- NWL income statement
- NWL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.