StockData

Ferroglobe vs Nexa Resources

GSM and NEXA side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GSM and NEXA compare

Nexa Resources grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.5% versus −18.8% for Ferroglobe).

Nexa Resources keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.4% compared with −12.8% at Ferroglobe.

Nexa Resources scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 3 for Ferroglobe), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGSMNEXA
Size and price
Share price$3.00$11.18
Change, 1 year−20.6%81.8%
Change, 5 years−50.1%33.3%
Beta (5Y)1.281.04
Employees155,615
StockData Score
Total score37 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score04 (better)
Health score3 (better)1
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−18.8%8.5% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average3.1%9.0% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−825%–
EPS growth (TTM)−858%–
Profitability
Gross margin–23.7%
Operating margin−10.0%16.6% (better)
Net margin−12.8%4.4% (better)
FCF margin−0.77%0.44% (better)
Return on equity−25.9%14.6% (better)
Return on invested capital−16.8%24.0% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.24 (better)1.70
Net debt / EBITDA–2.39
Interest coverage−6.4×1.6× (better)
Current ratio1.66 (better)0.87
Piotroski F-score38 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio–25.8%
Ownership
Held by institutions56.6%–
Held by insiders36.8%1.8%
Insider net buying, 12 months$324K–
Short interest, % of float4.7%0.51%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.