Ferroglobe vs MP Materials Corp. / DE
GSM and MP side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GSM and MP compare
MP Materials Corp. / DE grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (71.6% versus −18.8% for Ferroglobe).
MP Materials Corp. / DE keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −9.9% compared with −12.8% at Ferroglobe.
MP Materials Corp. / DE scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 3 for Ferroglobe), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GSM | MP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $6.5B |
| Share price | $2.87 | $36.73 |
| Change, 1 year | −26.6% | −42.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −52.2% | −14.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.27 | 1.36 |
| Employees | 15 | 998 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 16.4× |
| P/B | – | 3.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 132× |
| FCF yield | – | −8.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −18.8% | 71.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.1% | 10.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −825% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −858% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 30.6% |
| Operating margin | −10.0% (better) | −20.5% |
| Net margin | −12.8% | −9.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | −0.77% (better) | −134% |
| Return on equity | −25.9% | −2.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −16.8% | −5.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.24 (better) | 0.48 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | −8.66 |
| Interest coverage | −6.4× | −2.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.66 | 6.75 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.31 |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 56.6% | 82.7% |
| Held by insiders | 36.8% | 8.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $61.9K (better) | −$128M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.6% | 22.0% |
Go deeper
- GSM stock overview
- GSM income statement
- GSM valuation and score
- MP stock overview
- MP income statement
- MP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.