StockData

Ferroglobe vs Hudbay Minerals

GSM and HBM side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GSM and HBM compare

Hudbay Minerals grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.4% versus −18.8% for Ferroglobe).

Hudbay Minerals keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 25.7% compared with −12.8% at Ferroglobe.

Hudbay Minerals scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 3 for Ferroglobe), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGSMHBM
Size and price
Share price$3.86$21.70
Change, 1 year−22.2%33.7%
Change, 5 years−44.1%219%
Beta (5Y)1.181.43
Employees15–
StockData Score
Total score310 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score03 (better)
Performance score04 (better)
Health score33
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−18.8%9.4% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average3.1%15.1% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−825%641% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)−858%620% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin–33.6%
Operating margin−10.0%41.5% (better)
Net margin−12.8%25.7% (better)
FCF margin−0.77%10.9% (better)
Return on equity−25.9%19.7% (better)
Return on invested capital−16.8%16.7% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.24 (better)0.31
Net debt / EBITDA–0.32
Interest coverage−6.4×15.1× (better)
Current ratio1.66 (better)0.95
Piotroski F-score37 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio–0.99%
Ownership
Held by institutions56.6%83.1%
Held by insiders36.8%0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months$61.9K–
Short interest, % of float3.9%2.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.