Garden Stage vs Waton Financial
GSIW and WTF side by side, both in security & commodity brokers, dealers, exchanges & services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GSIW and WTF compare
Waton Financial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (48.8% versus 33.2% for Garden Stage).
Waton Financial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −137% compared with −190% at Garden Stage.
Garden Stage scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 7 for Waton Financial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GSIW | WTF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $10.41 | $2.02 |
| Change, 1 year | −67.8% | −61.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.98 | 1.24 |
| Employees | 9 | 30 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 33.2% | 48.8% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 194% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | −131% |
| Net margin | −190% | −137% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | −66.6% |
| Return on equity | −89.5% | −87.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | −140% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.72 (better) | 1.54 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 86.8% |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.09% | 2.7% |
Go deeper
- GSIW stock overview
- GSIW income statement
- GSIW valuation and score
- WTF stock overview
- WTF income statement
- WTF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.