Garden Stage vs TOP Financial
GSIW and TOP side by side, both in security & commodity brokers, dealers, exchanges & services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GSIW and TOP compare
TOP Financial grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (41.9% versus 33.2% for Garden Stage).
TOP Financial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −24.8% compared with −190% at Garden Stage.
Garden Stage scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 5 for TOP Financial), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GSIW | TOP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $10.41 | $15.43 |
| Change, 1 year | −69.0% | 191% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.97 | 1.22 |
| Employees | 9 | 30 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 33.2% | 41.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −22.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 194% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | −24.9% |
| Net margin | −190% | −24.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 278% |
| Return on equity | −89.5% | −1.5% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | −1.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.72 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 0.04% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 85.2% |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.09% | 1.6% |
Go deeper
- GSIW stock overview
- GSIW income statement
- GSIW valuation and score
- TOP stock overview
- TOP income statement
- TOP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.