StockData

GSI Technology vs SuperCom

GSIT and SPCB side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GSIT and SPCB compare

GSI Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.9% versus 0.94% for SuperCom).

SuperCom keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 13.4% compared with −79.5% at GSI Technology.

GSI Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for SuperCom), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGSITSPCB
Size and price
Market cap$128M–
Share price$3.34$8.62
Change, 1 year−59.9%−17.4%
Change, 5 years−43.4%−94.5%
Beta (5Y)2.111.13
Employees12555
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)7
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score03 (better)
Health score6 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S5.2×–
P/B1.5×–
FCF yield−20.3%–
Fair value$4.41–
Margin of safety24.2%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)2.9% (better)0.94%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−2.0%18.8% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)–467%
EPS growth (TTM)–97.4%
Profitability
Gross margin51.8%55.2% (better)
Operating margin−101%−1.2% (better)
Net margin−79.5%13.4% (better)
FCF margin−106%−22.8% (better)
Return on equity−31.5%8.8% (better)
Return on invested capital−130%−0.61% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.40 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA–3.40
Current ratio10.00 (better)5.75
Altman Z-score4.53–
Piotroski F-score6 (better)5
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions35.8%–
Held by insiders21.2%0.43%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$6.7M–
Short interest, % of float13.7%2.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.