StockData

GSI Technology vs Nano Labs

GSIT and NA side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GSIT and NA compare

GSI Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.9% versus −33.5% for Nano Labs).

Nano Labs keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 502% compared with −79.5% at GSI Technology.

GSI Technology scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for Nano Labs), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGSITNA
Size and price
Market cap$119M–
Share price$3.09$1.46
Change, 1 year−63.0%−67.0%
Change, 5 years−47.6%–
Beta (5Y)2.100.98
Employees12567
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)5
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score00
Performance score04 (better)
Health score6 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S4.8×–
P/B1.4×–
FCF yield−22.0%–
Fair value$4.19–
Margin of safety26.3%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)2.9% (better)−33.5%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−2.0%66.2% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin51.8% (better)−147%
Operating margin−101%264% (better)
Net margin−79.5%502% (better)
FCF margin−106% (better)−401%
Return on equity−31.5%26.5% (better)
Return on invested capital−130%10.7% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.51 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA–2.34
Interest coverage–4.2×
Current ratio10.00 (better)1.20
Altman Z-score4.15–
Piotroski F-score6 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions35.8%–
Held by insiders21.2%42.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$6.7M−$85.1K (better)
Short interest, % of float13.7%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.