Globalstar vs Iridium Communications
GSAT and IRDM side by side, both in communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GSAT and IRDM compare
Globalstar is the larger company, worth 2.3 times as much as Iridium Communications ($10.8B against $4.8B).
Globalstar grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.7% versus 3.1% for Iridium Communications).
Iridium Communications keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.5% compared with −19.4% at Globalstar.
Iridium Communications pays a dividend yielding 1.3%; Globalstar does not pay one.
Iridium Communications scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 5 for Globalstar), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GSAT | IRDM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.8B | $4.8B |
| Share price | $83.53 | $44.91 |
| Change, 1 year | 99.9% | 165% |
| Change, 5 years | 233% | 4.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.31 | 0.68 |
| Employees | 477 | 975 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 13 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 51.0× |
| P/S | 38.6× | 5.4× (better) |
| P/B | 37.0× | 10.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 119× | 10.8× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 16.5× |
| PEG | – | 0.35 |
| FCF yield | – | 6.1% |
| Fair value | $20.67 | $31.24 |
| Margin of safety | −304% | −43.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.7% (better) | 3.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.3% (better) | 8.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −17.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −11.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 4.7% | 23.8% (better) |
| Net margin | −19.4% | 10.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 32.6% |
| Return on equity | −16.7% | 19.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 2.7% | 47.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.23 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.56 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.55 | 2.78 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.97 (better) | 1.88 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 103% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 25.9% | 86.1% |
| Held by insiders | 59.2% | 22.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$36.8M | −$19.8M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.7% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- GSAT stock overview
- GSAT income statement
- GSAT valuation and score
- IRDM stock overview
- IRDM income statement
- IRDM valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.