StockData

GrowGeneration vs Hydrofarm

GRWG and HYFM side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GRWG and HYFM compare

GrowGeneration is the larger company, worth 26 times as much as Hydrofarm ($88.4M against $3.4M).

GrowGeneration grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1.6% versus −34.1% for Hydrofarm).

GrowGeneration keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −10.1% compared with −267% at Hydrofarm.

GrowGeneration scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 1 for Hydrofarm), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGRWGHYFM
Size and price
Market cap$88.4M$3.4M
Share price$1.50$0.696
Change, 1 year−3.8%−71.5%
Change, 5 years−93.2%−99.8%
Beta (5Y)2.382.65
Employees253251
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)1
Valuation score3 (better)1
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score5 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.5×0.0× (better)
P/B1.0×–
FCF yield–−158%
Fair value$3.22–
Margin of safety53.4%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)1.6% (better)−34.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−3.5% (better)−17.1%
Profitability
Gross margin26.4% (better)9.4%
Operating margin−10.8% (better)−253%
Net margin−10.1% (better)−267%
FCF margin–−5.0%
Return on equity−17.1% (better)−536%
Return on invested capital−26.6% (better)−135%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage–−16.8×
Current ratio3.89 (better)0.27
Altman Z-score−0.37 (better)−20.98
Piotroski F-score6 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions28.7%6.3%
Held by insiders9.3%20.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$107K−$7.4K (better)
Short interest, % of float2.3%11.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.