Grandstand vs NIP
GRSD and NIPG side by side, both in miscellaneous amusement and recreation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GRSD and NIPG compare
NIP grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (48.4% versus 30.1% for Grandstand).
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GRSD | NIPG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $0.890 | $3.64 |
| Change, 1 year | −87.1% | −92.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −92.8% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 1.03 |
| Employees | 600 | 247 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 30.1% | 48.4% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 42.7% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −211% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 90.8% (better) | −1.2% |
| Operating margin | −19.2% (better) | −197% |
| Net margin | – | −188% |
| FCF margin | 11.0% (better) | −12.6% |
| Return on equity | – | −147% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −110% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.49 |
| Interest coverage | −3.8× (better) | −111.1× |
| Current ratio | 0.59 | 0.87 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 3 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 30.6% | 0.01% |
| Held by insiders | 43.1% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $30.8K (better) | −$442K |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.4% | – |
Go deeper
- GRSD stock overview
- GRSD income statement
- GRSD valuation and score
- NIPG stock overview
- NIPG income statement
- NIPG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.