Granite Ridge Resources vs Riley Exploration Permian
GRNT and REPX side by side, both in crude petroleum and natural gas. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GRNT and REPX compare
Granite Ridge Resources and Riley Exploration Permian are about the same size, with market caps of $827M and $949M.
Riley Exploration Permian grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (45.5% versus 24.2% for Granite Ridge Resources).
Riley Exploration Permian keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.3% compared with −9.3% at Granite Ridge Resources.
Both pay dividends: Granite Ridge Resources yields 7.0% and Riley Exploration Permian 2.8%.
Riley Exploration Permian scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 6 for Granite Ridge Resources), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GRNT | REPX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $827M | $949M |
| Share price | $6.27 | $42.83 |
| Change, 1 year | 23.4% | 72.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −36.2% | 108% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.34 | 1.08 |
| Employees | 6 | 122 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 9.2× |
| P/S | 1.5× (better) | 1.6× |
| P/B | 1.5× | 1.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.2× | 3.1× (better) |
| Fair value | – | $58.41 |
| Margin of safety | – | 26.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.2% | 45.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 38.9% | 142% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −238% | 15.7% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −243% | 13.4% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 13.7% | 45.6% (better) |
| Net margin | −9.3% | 17.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | −8.8% | 16.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.4% | 23.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.85 | 0.38 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.43 | 0.57 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 1.8× | 9.5× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.90 (better) | 0.41 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.22 | 2.09 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 7.0% (better) | 2.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.0% (better) | 2.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 84.3% | 69.8% |
| Held by insiders | 70.9% | 44.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.3M (better) | −$71.9M |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.2% | 9.4% |
Go deeper
- GRNT stock overview
- GRNT income statement
- GRNT valuation and score
- REPX stock overview
- REPX income statement
- REPX valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.