Green Brick Partners vs Smith Douglas Homes
GRBK and SDHC side by side, both in operative builders. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GRBK and SDHC compare
Green Brick Partners is the larger company, worth 33 times as much as Smith Douglas Homes ($2.6B against $79.4M).
On earnings, Green Brick Partners is cheaper: it trades at 9.8× trailing earnings, against 16.2× for Smith Douglas Homes.
Smith Douglas Homes grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (0.42% versus −7.3% for Green Brick Partners).
Green Brick Partners keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.2% compared with 0.49% at Smith Douglas Homes.
Green Brick Partners scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 2 for Smith Douglas Homes), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GRBK | SDHC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.6B | $79.4M |
| Share price | $60.92 | $9.05 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.4% | −49.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 124% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.30 | 1.02 |
| Employees | 620 | 510 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.8× (better) | 16.2× |
| P/S | 1.3× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 1.3× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 37.0× | – |
| PEG | 1.78 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.7% (better) | −28.2% |
| Fair value | $60.96 | $10.78 |
| Margin of safety | 0.06% | 16.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −7.3% | 0.42% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.9% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −19.5% (better) | −56.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −18.4% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 25.8% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.2% (better) | 18.2% |
| Net margin | 14.2% (better) | 0.49% |
| FCF margin | 3.6% (better) | −2.2% |
| Return on equity | 14.3% (better) | 6.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 4.29 (better) | 1.88 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | 1.1% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 2.2% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.8% | 14.6% |
| Held by insiders | 60.7% | 90.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$533K | $796K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.2% | 21.4% |
Go deeper
- GRBK stock overview
- GRBK income statement
- GRBK valuation and score
- SDHC stock overview
- SDHC income statement
- SDHC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.