Green Brick Partners vs M/I Homes
GRBK and MHO side by side, both in operative builders. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GRBK and MHO compare
M/I Homes is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Green Brick Partners ($3.2B against $2.6B).
On earnings, Green Brick Partners is cheaper: it trades at 9.8× trailing earnings, against 12.1× for M/I Homes.
M/I Homes grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−6.0% versus −7.3% for Green Brick Partners).
Green Brick Partners keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.2% compared with 6.6% at M/I Homes.
M/I Homes scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 9 for Green Brick Partners), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GRBK | MHO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.6B | $3.2B |
| Share price | $61.07 | $126.96 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.7% | −1.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 124% | 111% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.31 | 1.16 |
| Employees | 620 | 1,801 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.8× (better) | 12.1× |
| P/S | 1.3× | 0.8× (better) |
| P/B | 1.3× | 1.0× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.6× (better) | 7.4× |
| P/FCF | 37.1× | 23.2× (better) |
| PEG | 1.78 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.7% | 4.3% (better) |
| Fair value | $60.80 | $110.04 |
| Margin of safety | −0.44% (better) | −15.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −7.3% | −6.0% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.9% (better) | 7.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −19.5% (better) | −41.3% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −18.4% (better) | −38.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 25.8% (better) | 12.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.2% (better) | 20.7% |
| Operating margin | – | 8.2% |
| Net margin | 14.2% (better) | 6.6% |
| FCF margin | 3.6% (better) | 3.3% |
| Return on equity | 14.3% (better) | 8.7% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 10.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.29 (better) | 3.29 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | 1.1% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.2% | 6.4% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 2.2% | 6.4% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.8% | 98.8% |
| Held by insiders | 60.7% | 3.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$533K (better) | −$25.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.2% | 6.3% |
Go deeper
- GRBK stock overview
- GRBK income statement
- GRBK valuation and score
- MHO stock overview
- MHO income statement
- MHO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.