Green Brick Partners vs LGI Homes
GRBK and LGIH side by side, both in operative builders. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GRBK and LGIH compare
Green Brick Partners is the larger company, worth 2.7 times as much as LGI Homes ($2.6B against $960M).
On earnings, Green Brick Partners is cheaper: it trades at 9.8× trailing earnings, against 14.5× for LGI Homes.
Green Brick Partners grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−7.3% versus −16.7% for LGI Homes).
Green Brick Partners keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.2% compared with 3.9% at LGI Homes.
Green Brick Partners scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for LGI Homes), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GRBK | LGIH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.6B | $960M |
| Share price | $61.07 | $41.29 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.7% | −15.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 124% | −72.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.31 | 1.38 |
| Employees | 620 | 1,056 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.8× (better) | 14.5× |
| P/S | 1.3× | 0.6× (better) |
| P/B | 1.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.6× (better) | 9.3× |
| P/FCF | 37.1× | 7.3× (better) |
| PEG | 1.78 | – |
| FCF yield | 2.7% | 13.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $60.80 | $36.49 |
| Margin of safety | −0.44% (better) | −13.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −7.3% (better) | −16.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.9% (better) | −6.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −19.5% (better) | −57.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −18.4% (better) | −57.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 25.8% (better) | −24.5% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.2% (better) | 19.4% |
| Net margin | 14.2% (better) | 3.9% |
| FCF margin | 3.6% | 7.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 14.3% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 4.29 (better) | 1.54 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | 1.1% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.2% (better) | −0.39% |
| Shareholder yield | 2.2% (better) | −0.39% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 81.8% | 91.5% |
| Held by insiders | 60.7% | 12.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$533K (better) | −$2.6M |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.2% | 15.1% |
Go deeper
- GRBK stock overview
- GRBK income statement
- GRBK valuation and score
- LGIH stock overview
- LGIH income statement
- LGIH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.