Green Brick Partners vs Invitation Homes
GRBK and INVH side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GRBK and INVH compare
Invitation Homes is the larger company, worth 6.0 times as much as Green Brick Partners ($15.7B against $2.6B).
On earnings, Green Brick Partners is cheaper: it trades at 9.2× trailing earnings, against 24.4× for Invitation Homes.
Invitation Homes grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.7% versus −5.7% for Green Brick Partners).
Invitation Homes keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 23.1% compared with 14.7% at Green Brick Partners.
Invitation Homes pays a dividend yielding 4.5%; Green Brick Partners does not pay one.
Invitation Homes scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 11 for Green Brick Partners), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GRBK | INVH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.6B | $15.7B |
| Share price | $60.86 | $26.56 |
| Change, 1 year | −5.5% | −3.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 135% | −34.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.33 | 0.70 |
| Employees | 620 | 1,725 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 4 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 9.2× (better) | 24.4× |
| P/S | 1.3× (better) | 5.5× |
| P/B | 1.3× (better) | 1.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 6.1× | – |
| P/FCF | 23.5× | – |
| PEG | 1.66 | 1.62 (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.3% | – |
| Fair value | $64.14 | $31.40 |
| Margin of safety | 5.1% | 15.4% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −5.7% | 6.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.9% (better) | 8.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −16.7% | 21.2% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −15.2% | 23.9% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 25.8% (better) | 22.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 30.0% | – |
| Net margin | 14.7% | 23.1% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.6% | – |
| Return on equity | 15.7% (better) | 7.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 4.46 (better) | 1.04 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 4.5% |
| Payout ratio | 0.99% | 109% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 14.3% |
| Buyback yield | 1.5% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.5% | 4.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 80.7% | 101% |
| Held by insiders | 59.9% | 0.41% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$533K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.6% | 2.9% |
Go deeper
- GRBK stock overview
- GRBK income statement
- GRBK valuation and score
- INVH stock overview
- INVH income statement
- INVH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.