StockData

Hyperscale Data vs OMS Energy Technologies

GPUS and OMSE side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GPUS and OMSE compare

OMS Energy Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 20.7% compared with −71.0% at Hyperscale Data.

OMS Energy Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 2 for Hyperscale Data), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGPUSOMSE
Size and price
Market cap$119M–
Share price$0.169$3.94
Change, 1 year−90.2%−22.9%
Change, 5 years−100%–
Beta (5Y)0.950.25
Employees612616
StockData Score
Total score26 (better)
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score01 (better)
Performance score13 (better)
Health score02 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.9×–
P/B1.1×–
FCF yield−87.3%–
Fair value$0.146–
Margin of safety−16.0%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)–−23.4%
Revenue growth, 5Y average33.7%–
Net income growth (TTM)–−28.1%
EPS growth (TTM)–−34.7%
Profitability
Gross margin26.1%30.3% (better)
Operating margin−69.3%22.4% (better)
Net margin−71.0%20.7% (better)
FCF margin−79.8%34.0% (better)
Return on equity−160%20.2% (better)
Return on invested capital−194%65.7% (better)
Financial health
Interest coverage−6.0×86.3× (better)
Current ratio0.576.65 (better)
Altman Z-score−3.54–
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions–0.70%
Held by insiders54.5%64.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months$7.2M–
Short interest, % of float4.7%0.02%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.