Hyperscale Data vs Oil States International
GPUS and OIS side by side, both in construction, mining, and materials handling. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GPUS and OIS compare
Oil States International is the larger company, worth 4.3 times as much as Hyperscale Data ($511M against $119M).
Oil States International keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −16.5% compared with −71.0% at Hyperscale Data.
Oil States International scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 2 for Hyperscale Data), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GPUS | OIS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $119M | $511M |
| Share price | $0.169 | $8.55 |
| Change, 1 year | −90.2% | 30.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −100% | 71.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.95 | 0.93 |
| Employees | 612 | 2,172 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.9× | 0.8× (better) |
| P/B | 1.1× | 0.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 15.1× |
| FCF yield | −87.3% | 6.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $0.146 | $7.75 |
| Margin of safety | −16.0% | −10.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | – | −0.74% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 33.7% (better) | 0.95% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −565% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −592% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 26.1% (better) | 20.2% |
| Operating margin | −69.3% | −14.0% (better) |
| Net margin | −71.0% | −16.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | −79.8% | 5.2% (better) |
| Return on equity | −160% | −16.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −194% | −11.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.03 |
| Interest coverage | −6.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.57 | 2.36 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −3.54 | 2.27 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 1.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 1.9% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 92.8% |
| Held by insiders | 54.5% | 8.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $7.2M (better) | −$593K |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.7% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- GPUS stock overview
- GPUS income statement
- GPUS valuation and score
- OIS stock overview
- OIS income statement
- OIS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.