StockData

Green Plains vs Methanex

GPRE and MEOH side by side, both in chemicals and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GPRE and MEOH compare

Methanex grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−3.5% versus −19.1% for Green Plains).

Green Plains scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 4 for Methanex), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGPREMEOH
Size and price
Market cap$934M–
Share price$13.32$70.51
Change, 1 year36.3%82.6%
Change, 5 years−67.0%63.3%
Beta (5Y)0.850.71
Employees642–
StockData Score
Total score13 (better)4
Valuation score5 (better)0
Growth score11
Performance score4 (better)0
Health score33
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E5.4×–
P/S0.5×–
P/B1.0×–
EV/EBITDA4.8×–
P/FCF11.6×–
FCF yield8.6%–
Fair value$68.08–
Margin of safety80.4%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−19.1%−3.5% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average1.7%6.3% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)–−61.1%
Profitability
Gross margin19.7%35.7% (better)
Operating margin9.3%12.0% (better)
Net margin10.9%–
FCF margin4.4%25.5% (better)
Return on equity22.9%–
Return on invested capital15.4% (better)7.3%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.50 (better)1.13
Net debt / EBITDA1.21 (better)2.65
Interest coverage5.0× (better)2.0×
Current ratio2.31 (better)2.06
Altman Z-score2.17–
Piotroski F-score5–
Dividends and buybacks
Years of dividend growth–1
Dividend growth, 5Y average–9.4%
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions111%76.2%
Held by insiders18.1%15.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months$101K–
Superinvestors holding–1
Short interest, % of float22.7%3.7%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.