Graphic Packaging vs Sonoco Products
GPK and SON side by side, both in paper and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GPK and SON compare
Sonoco Products is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Graphic Packaging ($4.9B against $2.6B).
On earnings, Sonoco Products is cheaper: it trades at 7.9× trailing earnings, against 13.6× for Graphic Packaging.
Sonoco Products grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.7% versus 0.02% for Graphic Packaging).
Sonoco Products keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 8.4% compared with 2.2% at Graphic Packaging.
Both pay dividends: Graphic Packaging yields 4.9% and Sonoco Products 4.3%.
Sonoco Products scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 12 for Graphic Packaging), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GPK | SON |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.6B | $4.9B |
| Share price | $8.95 | $49.96 |
| Change, 1 year | −45.0% | 25.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −56.4% | −17.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 0.73 |
| Employees | 23K | 23K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 5 | 5 |
| Growth score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.6× | 7.9× (better) |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 1.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.6× | 5.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | – | 13.9× |
| PEG | – | 0.28 |
| FCF yield | – | 7.2% |
| Fair value | $16.31 | $89.85 |
| Margin of safety | 45.1% (better) | 44.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.02% | 17.7% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.6% | 7.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −63.7% | 12.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −62.7% | 12.7% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 19.8% | 37.5% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 15.5% | 20.8% (better) |
| Operating margin | 5.8% | 13.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.2% | 8.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 4.8% |
| Return on equity | 6.0% | 18.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.3% | 10.1% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.75 | 1.24 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.14 | 2.75 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.0× | 5.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.38 (better) | 0.99 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.34 | 1.83 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.9% (better) | 4.3% |
| Payout ratio | 67.0% | 33.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 4.2% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.15% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.9% (better) | 4.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 119% | 98.6% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 1.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.1M (better) | $884K |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.6% | 11.4% |
Go deeper
- GPK stock overview
- GPK income statement
- GPK valuation and score
- SON stock overview
- SON income statement
- SON valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.