Graphic Packaging vs Packaging Corp of America
GPK and PKG side by side, both in paper and allied products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GPK and PKG compare
Packaging Corp of America is the larger company, worth 8.6 times as much as Graphic Packaging ($22.9B against $2.6B).
On earnings, Graphic Packaging is cheaper: it trades at 13.6× trailing earnings, against 33.4× for Packaging Corp of America.
Packaging Corp of America grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.3% versus 0.02% for Graphic Packaging).
Packaging Corp of America keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.3% compared with 2.2% at Graphic Packaging.
Both pay dividends: Graphic Packaging yields 4.9% and Packaging Corp of America 2.1%.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GPK | PKG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.6B | $22.9B |
| Share price | $8.95 | $256.82 |
| Change, 1 year | −45.0% | 30.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −56.4% | 89.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 0.65 |
| Employees | 23K | 17K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 12 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 13.6× (better) | 33.4× |
| P/S | 0.3× (better) | 2.4× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 4.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.6× (better) | 14.5× |
| P/FCF | – | 30.8× |
| FCF yield | – | 3.2% |
| Fair value | $16.31 | $154.51 |
| Margin of safety | 45.1% (better) | −66.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.02% | 10.3% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.6% | 6.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −63.7% | −23.5% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −62.7% | −23.2% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 19.8% (better) | 12.1% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 15.5% | 20.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 5.8% | 10.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 2.2% | 7.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 7.8% |
| Return on equity | 6.0% | 14.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.3% | 10.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.75 | 0.85 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.14 | 1.86 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 2.0× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.38 | 2.94 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 1.34 | 4.09 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.9% (better) | 2.1% |
| Payout ratio | 67.0% | 64.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 8.2% |
| Shareholder yield | 4.9% (better) | 2.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 119% | 98.1% |
| Held by insiders | 1.5% | 1.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.1M (better) | −$15.0M |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.6% | 3.4% |
Go deeper
- GPK stock overview
- GPK income statement
- GPK valuation and score
- PKG stock overview
- PKG income statement
- PKG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.