Group 1 Automotive vs Openlane
GPI and OPLN side by side, both in retail-auto dealers & gasoline stations. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GPI and OPLN compare
Openlane is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Group 1 Automotive ($4.3B against $3.1B).
Openlane grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.8% versus −3.4% for Group 1 Automotive).
Openlane keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.2% compared with 1.7% at Group 1 Automotive.
Group 1 Automotive pays a dividend yielding 0.83%; Openlane does not pay one.
Openlane scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 10 for Group 1 Automotive), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GPI | OPLN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.1B | $4.3B |
| Share price | $260.21 | $34.74 |
| Change, 1 year | −33.6% | 38.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 36.3% | 135% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 1.05 |
| Employees | 20K | 4,800 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 8.2× | – |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 2.0× |
| P/B | 1.0× (better) | 2.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.8× (better) | 13.2× |
| P/FCF | 13.7× | 11.2× (better) |
| FCF yield | 7.3% | 8.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $298.22 | $22.88 |
| Margin of safety | 12.7% (better) | −51.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −3.4% | 12.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.3% (better) | 7.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 0.96% | 15.8% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 10.6% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 10.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 15.9% | 45.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.6% | 11.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.7% | 9.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.0% | 17.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 12.4% | 13.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 9.5% | 14.4% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.27 | 0.34 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 3.82 | 0.84 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 6.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.32 (better) | 1.16 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.24 (better) | 1.58 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.83% | – |
| Payout ratio | 6.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 5 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 27.2% | – |
| Buyback yield | 12.1% (better) | 2.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 13.0% (better) | 2.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 100% | 87.7% |
| Held by insiders | 19.4% | 7.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $211M (better) | −$289M |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 14.9% | 1.5% |
Go deeper
- GPI stock overview
- GPI income statement
- GPI valuation and score
- OPLN stock overview
- OPLN income statement
- OPLN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.