StockData

Canada Goose vs Ermenegildo Zegna

GOOS and ZGN side by side, both in apparel and other finished products made from fabrics and similar materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GOOS and ZGN compare

Canada Goose grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.3% versus −1.5% for Ermenegildo Zegna).

Ermenegildo Zegna keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 5.1% compared with 1.5% at Canada Goose.

Ermenegildo Zegna scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for Canada Goose), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGOOSZGN
Size and price
Share price$8.46$13.80
Change, 1 year−36.9%32.7%
Change, 5 years−83.5%37.0%
Beta (5Y)1.320.82
Employees1,000300
StockData Score
Total score510 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score14 (better)
Health score34 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)13.3% (better)−1.5%
Revenue growth, 5Y average11.1%13.6% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−76.3%27.9% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)−76.3%26.7% (better)
EPS growth, 5Y average−18.3%–
Profitability
Gross margin69.7% (better)67.5%
Operating margin5.8%7.3% (better)
Net margin1.5%5.1% (better)
FCF margin9.8%13.3% (better)
Return on equity3.9%10.3% (better)
Return on invested capital22.1% (better)10.3%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.01 (better)0.22
Net debt / EBITDA−1.83−0.00
Interest coverage–2.8×
Current ratio2.63 (better)1.47
Piotroski F-score67 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio–30.9%
Ownership
Held by institutions25.2%17.8%
Held by insiders71.5%–
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$814K
Superinvestors holding–1

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.