Canada Goose vs Oxford Industries
GOOS and OXM side by side, both in apparel and other finished products made from fabrics and similar materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GOOS and OXM compare
Canada Goose grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.3% versus −1.8% for Oxford Industries).
Canada Goose keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.5% compared with −0.46% at Oxford Industries.
Oxford Industries pays a dividend yielding 9.9%; Canada Goose does not pay one.
Oxford Industries scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 5 for Canada Goose), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GOOS | OXM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $420M |
| Share price | $8.46 | $28.05 |
| Change, 1 year | −36.9% | −23.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −83.5% | −73.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.32 | 0.95 |
| Employees | 1,000 | 6,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 0.3× |
| P/B | – | 0.7× |
| P/FCF | – | 8.1× |
| FCF yield | – | 12.4% |
| Fair value | – | $83.68 |
| Margin of safety | – | 66.5% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 13.3% (better) | −1.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 11.1% | 14.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −76.3% (better) | −112% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −76.3% (better) | −114% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −18.3% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 69.7% (better) | 63.6% |
| Operating margin | 5.8% (better) | −0.12% |
| Net margin | 1.5% (better) | −0.46% |
| FCF margin | 9.8% (better) | 3.6% |
| Return on equity | 3.9% (better) | −1.2% |
| Return on invested capital | 22.1% (better) | −0.21% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.01 (better) | 0.13 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −1.83 | – |
| Current ratio | 2.63 (better) | 1.17 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.87 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 9.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 22.5% |
| Buyback yield | – | −0.35% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 9.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 25.2% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 71.5% | 4.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $471K |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 26.5% |
Go deeper
- GOOS stock overview
- GOOS income statement
- GOOS valuation and score
- OXM stock overview
- OXM income statement
- OXM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.