StockData

Canada Goose vs Lanvin

GOOS and LANV side by side, both in apparel and other finished products made from fabrics and similar materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GOOS and LANV compare

Canada Goose grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.3% versus −17.6% for Lanvin).

Canada Goose keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.5% compared with −99.2% at Lanvin.

Canada Goose scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 0 for Lanvin), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGOOSLANV
Size and price
Share price$8.55$0.720
Change, 1 year−34.2%−64.5%
Change, 5 years−83.3%−92.6%
Beta (5Y)1.32−0.02
Employees1,0002,066
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)0
Valuation score00
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score3 (better)0
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)13.3% (better)−17.6%
Revenue growth, 5Y average11.1% (better)1.6%
Net income growth (TTM)−76.3%–
EPS growth (TTM)−76.3%–
EPS growth, 5Y average−18.3%–
Profitability
Gross margin69.7% (better)58.2%
Operating margin5.8% (better)−96.3%
Net margin1.5% (better)−99.2%
FCF margin9.8%–
Return on equity3.9%–
Return on invested capital22.1% (better)−42.6%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.01–
Net debt / EBITDA−1.83–
Interest coverage–−6.5×
Current ratio2.63 (better)0.20
Piotroski F-score6 (better)3
Ownership
Held by institutions25.2%–
Held by insiders71.5%72.4%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.