Gladstone Commercial vs New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership
GOOD and NEN side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GOOD and NEN compare
Gladstone Commercial is the larger company, worth 105 times as much as New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership ($553M against $5.3M).
New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.1% versus 10.8% for Gladstone Commercial).
Gladstone Commercial keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.5% compared with −7.3% at New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership.
Both pay dividends: Gladstone Commercial yields 10.5% and New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership 3.5%.
Gladstone Commercial scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 6 for New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GOOD | NEN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $553M | $5.3M |
| Share price | $11.43 | $45.96 |
| Change, 1 year | 2.1% | −34.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −49.5% | −23.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.80 | 0.06 |
| Employees | 75 | 16 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 44.0× | – |
| P/S | 3.3× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 3.5× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | – | −0.4× |
| Fair value | $11.50 | $3599.85 |
| Margin of safety | 0.63% | 98.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.8% | 16.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.9% | 7.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −13.6% (better) | −143% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −27.8% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 9.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 14.2% |
| Net margin | 14.5% (better) | −7.3% |
| Return on equity | 14.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | – | 0.6× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.50 (better) | 0.29 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 10.5% (better) | 3.5% |
| Payout ratio | 282% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −4.4% | – |
| Buyback yield | −4.2% | 33.7% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 6.3% | 37.1% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 54.7% | 82.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.21% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $180K | – |
Go deeper
- GOOD stock overview
- GOOD income statement
- GOOD valuation and score
- NEN stock overview
- NEN income statement
- NEN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.