Acushnet vs YETI
GOLF and YETI side by side, both in dolls, toys, games and sporting and athletic. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GOLF and YETI compare
Acushnet is the larger company, worth 1.7 times as much as YETI ($4.8B against $2.9B).
On earnings, YETI is cheaper: it trades at 16.3× trailing earnings, against 22.5× for Acushnet.
YETI grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (6.9% versus 6.8% for Acushnet).
YETI keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.4% compared with 8.2% at Acushnet.
Acushnet pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; YETI does not pay one.
YETI scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 16 for Acushnet), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GOLF | YETI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.8B | $2.9B |
| Share price | $82.94 | $39.42 |
| Change, 1 year | 1.8% | 2.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 46.9% | −61.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.83 | 1.44 |
| Employees | 7,300 | 1,390 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 | 18 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 5 | 5 |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 22.5× | 16.3× (better) |
| P/S | 1.8× | 1.5× (better) |
| P/B | 5.6× | 4.5× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.5× | 9.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 20.3× | 12.3× (better) |
| PEG | 5.37 | 0.64 (better) |
| FCF yield | 4.9% | 8.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $65.19 | $41.21 |
| Margin of safety | −27.2% | 4.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 6.8% | 6.9% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.7% | 11.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −0.81% | 14.6% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 0.82% | 26.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 19.4% (better) | 2.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 49.4% | 59.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 13.3% (better) | 12.4% |
| Net margin | 8.2% | 9.4% (better) |
| FCF margin | 8.8% | 11.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 25.7% | 27.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 16.9% | 29.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.01 | 0.11 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.85 (better) | −0.01 |
| Current ratio | 2.02 (better) | 1.77 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.69 | 6.05 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.2% | – |
| Payout ratio | 26.8% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 9 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 8.7% | – |
| Buyback yield | 2.2% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.4% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 55.1% | 117% |
| Held by insiders | 52.9% | 1.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.4M | −$442K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.6% | 11.3% |
Go deeper
- GOLF stock overview
- GOLF income statement
- GOLF valuation and score
- YETI stock overview
- YETI income statement
- YETI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.