Gold.com vs Newmont
GOLD and NEM side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GOLD and NEM compare
Newmont is the larger company, worth 111 times as much as Gold.com ($118B against $1.1B).
On earnings, Gold.com is cheaper: it trades at 12.0× trailing earnings, against 13.2× for Newmont.
Gold.com grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (110% versus 23.7% for Newmont).
Newmont keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 34.7% compared with 0.34% at Gold.com.
Both pay dividends: Gold.com yields 5.0% and Newmont 0.91%.
Newmont scores higher on the StockData Score (21 against 17 for Gold.com), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GOLD | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.1B | $118B |
| Share price | $36.22 | $113.14 |
| Change, 1 year | 37.8% | 21.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 8.1% | 100% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.12 | 0.67 |
| Employees | 1,355 | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 | 21 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.0× (better) | 13.2× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 4.4× |
| P/B | 1.3× (better) | 3.3× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.7× (better) | 6.9× |
| P/FCF | 2.8× (better) | 11.7× |
| FCF yield | 35.4% (better) | 8.6% |
| Fair value | $68.08 | $180.88 |
| Margin of safety | 46.8% (better) | 37.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 110% (better) | 23.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 27.4% (better) | 14.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 1048% (better) | 28.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 975% (better) | 33.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −19.4% | 12.7% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 1.9% | 69.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.34% | 34.7% (better) |
| FCF margin | 1.5% | 37.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.4% | 26.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 (better) | 0.14 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.61 | −0.23 |
| Current ratio | 1.15 | 2.45 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 7.25 (better) | 3.94 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 9 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.0% (better) | 0.91% |
| Payout ratio | 62.0% | 11.9% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −0.78% |
| Buyback yield | – | 4.8% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.0% | 5.7% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 59.3% | 80.4% |
| Held by insiders | 32.3% | 0.11% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$9.6M (better) | −$13.4M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 17.8% | – |
Go deeper
- GOLD stock overview
- GOLD income statement
- GOLD valuation and score
- NEM stock overview
- NEM income statement
- NEM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.