Gold.com vs Henry Schein
GOLD and HSIC side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GOLD and HSIC compare
Henry Schein is the larger company, worth 8.7 times as much as Gold.com ($9.6B against $1.1B).
On earnings, Gold.com is cheaper: it trades at 12.6× trailing earnings, against 25.2× for Henry Schein.
Gold.com grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (132% versus 6.5% for Henry Schein).
Henry Schein keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.0% compared with 0.32% at Gold.com.
Gold.com pays a dividend yielding 4.7%; Henry Schein does not pay one.
Gold.com scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 6 for Henry Schein), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GOLD | HSIC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.1B | $9.6B |
| Share price | $38.03 | $86.44 |
| Change, 1 year | 40.2% | 36.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 5.7% | 7.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.13 | 0.56 |
| Employees | 1,355 | 25K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 12.6× (better) | 25.2× |
| P/S | 0.0× (better) | 0.7× |
| P/B | 1.3× (better) | 3.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 2.9× (better) | 13.5× |
| P/FCF | 0.9× (better) | 16.9× |
| FCF yield | 109% (better) | 5.9% |
| Fair value | $74.63 | $72.60 |
| Margin of safety | 49.0% (better) | −19.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 132% (better) | 6.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 27.4% (better) | 5.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 375% (better) | 3.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 325% (better) | 10.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −19.4% | 3.0% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 1.8% | 31.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | – | 5.0% |
| Net margin | 0.32% | 3.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 4.7% (better) | 4.2% |
| Return on equity | 10.8% | 12.2% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 8.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 (better) | 1.10 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −2.81 | 3.28 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 4.3× |
| Current ratio | 1.15 | 1.32 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 6.69 (better) | 2.77 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 4.7% | – |
| Payout ratio | 27.3% | – |
| Buyback yield | −12.6% | 7.6% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −7.9% | 7.6% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 59.3% | 110% |
| Held by insiders | 32.3% | 18.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$21.4M | −$7.9M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 17.9% | 9.1% |
Go deeper
- GOLD stock overview
- GOLD income statement
- GOLD valuation and score
- HSIC stock overview
- HSIC income statement
- HSIC valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.