StockData

Eva Live vs MindForge

GOAI and MF side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GOAI and MF compare

Eva Live grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (60.2% versus −49.9% for MindForge).

Eva Live keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −14.1% compared with −223% at MindForge.

Eva Live scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for MindForge), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGOAIMF
Size and price
Market cap$18.8M–
Share price$0.479$18.90
Change, 1 year−88.2%−67.4%
Change, 5 years−88.0%–
Beta (5Y)0.752.98
Employees315
StockData Score
Total score7 (better)4
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score14 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1.1×–
P/B1.5×–
Fair value$2.77–
Margin of safety82.7%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)60.2% (better)−49.9%
Profitability
Gross margin–−0.54%
Operating margin−16.7% (better)−98.2%
Net margin−14.1% (better)−223%
Return on equity−30.6% (better)−167%
Return on invested capital−48.2% (better)−140%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Interest coverage−5.3× (better)−20934.3×
Current ratio3.51 (better)1.14
Altman Z-score0.44–
Piotroski F-score4 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions1.8%0.00%
Held by insiders60.0%–
Insider net buying, 12 months$155K–
Short interest, % of float1.8%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.