Genco Shipping & Trading vs Star Bulk Carriers
GNK and SBLK side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GNK and SBLK compare
Genco Shipping & Trading grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (54.7% versus −17.6% for Star Bulk Carriers).
Genco Shipping & Trading keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 15.5% compared with 8.1% at Star Bulk Carriers.
Genco Shipping & Trading pays a dividend yielding 6.9%; Star Bulk Carriers does not pay one.
Genco Shipping & Trading scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 2 for Star Bulk Carriers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GNK | SBLK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.1B | – |
| Share price | $26.14 | $28.02 |
| Change, 1 year | 47.5% | 49.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 86.4% | 48.4% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.85 | 0.69 |
| Employees | 75 | 294 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 11 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 14.7× | – |
| P/S | 2.2× | – |
| P/B | 1.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 8.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 11.3% | – |
| Fair value | $23.70 | – |
| Margin of safety | −10.3% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 54.7% (better) | −17.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.77% | 8.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −72.4% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −73.9% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 48.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 19.2% (better) | 13.1% |
| Net margin | 15.5% (better) | 8.1% |
| FCF margin | 25.1% (better) | 20.3% |
| Return on equity | 8.9% (better) | 3.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 7.3% (better) | 6.8% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.41 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.48 | – |
| Interest coverage | 4.8× (better) | 1.9× |
| Current ratio | 2.58 (better) | 1.91 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.75 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.9% | – |
| Payout ratio | 99.8% | 40.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 26.1% | 43.1% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 6.9% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 55.5% | 35.7% |
| Held by insiders | 7.4% | 18.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$63.1M (better) | −$2.6B |
| Short interest, % of float | 5.7% | 4.3% |
Go deeper
- GNK stock overview
- GNK income statement
- GNK valuation and score
- SBLK stock overview
- SBLK income statement
- SBLK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.