Genco Shipping & Trading vs Pangaea Logistics Solutions
GNK and PANL side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GNK and PANL compare
Genco Shipping & Trading is the larger company, worth 2.2 times as much as Pangaea Logistics Solutions ($1.1B against $521M).
On earnings, Pangaea Logistics Solutions is cheaper: it trades at 10.6× trailing earnings, against 28.8× for Genco Shipping & Trading.
Genco Shipping & Trading grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.6% versus 22.5% for Pangaea Logistics Solutions).
Genco Shipping & Trading keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 9.1% compared with 6.7% at Pangaea Logistics Solutions.
Both pay dividends: Genco Shipping & Trading yields 6.9% and Pangaea Logistics Solutions 3.1%.
Pangaea Logistics Solutions scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 10 for Genco Shipping & Trading), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GNK | PANL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.1B | $521M |
| Share price | $26.19 | $7.96 |
| Change, 1 year | 58.0% | 63.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 65.7% | 80.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.86 | 0.77 |
| Employees | 75 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 28.8× | 10.6× (better) |
| P/S | 2.6× | 0.7× (better) |
| P/B | 1.3× | 1.2× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 9.9× | 6.2× (better) |
| P/FCF | 16.3× | – |
| FCF yield | 6.1% | – |
| Fair value | $17.70 | $9.34 |
| Margin of safety | −48.0% | 14.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 25.6% (better) | 22.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.77% | 10.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 162% | 439% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 168% | 241% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 2.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 12.8% (better) | 9.3% |
| Net margin | 9.1% (better) | 6.7% |
| FCF margin | 15.9% | – |
| Return on equity | 4.5% | 11.0% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 4.3% | 8.9% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.36 (better) | 0.53 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.75 | 1.16 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 3.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.97 (better) | 1.38 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.83 | 2.02 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.9% (better) | 3.1% |
| Payout ratio | 126% | 49.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 26.1% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 6.9% (better) | 3.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 55.5% | 42.8% |
| Held by insiders | 7.4% | 49.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$63.1M | −$1.1M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 3.7% | 2.9% |
Go deeper
- GNK stock overview
- GNK income statement
- GNK valuation and score
- PANL stock overview
- PANL income statement
- PANL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.