Genie Energy vs OPAL Fuels
GNE and OPAL side by side, both in combination electric and gas, and other utility. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GNE and OPAL compare
Genie Energy is the larger company, worth 12 times as much as OPAL Fuels ($507M against $41.8M).
On earnings, Genie Energy is cheaper: it trades at 17.7× trailing earnings, against 19.9× for OPAL Fuels.
OPAL Fuels grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.1% versus 1.7% for Genie Energy).
Genie Energy pays a dividend yielding 1.2%; OPAL Fuels does not pay one.
Genie Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 7 for OPAL Fuels), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GNE | OPAL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $507M | $41.8M |
| Share price | $19.25 | $1.39 |
| Change, 1 year | 28.9% | −39.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 306% | −85.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.11 | 0.98 |
| Employees | 139 | 331 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 17.7× (better) | 19.9× |
| P/S | 1.0× | 0.1× (better) |
| P/B | 1.9× | 1.1× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 11.5× (better) | −0.8× |
| PEG | – | 2.57 |
| FCF yield | – | −44.5% |
| Fair value | $18.37 | $2.54 |
| Margin of safety | −4.8% | 45.3% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.7% | 2.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.1% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 8.9% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 10.1% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 15.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 28.2% | – |
| Operating margin | 5.2% (better) | 5.2% |
| Net margin | 5.9% | – |
| FCF margin | – | −5.5% |
| Return on equity | 12.5% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 57.0% (better) | 10.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.03 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −6.98 | – |
| Interest coverage | 46.0× (better) | 0.6× |
| Current ratio | 2.78 (better) | 1.54 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.10 (better) | 0.57 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.2% | – |
| Payout ratio | 27.3% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −1.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.2% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 40.0% | 9.8% |
| Held by insiders | 22.1% | 85.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $0 | $461K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.5% | 11.4% |
Go deeper
- GNE stock overview
- GNE income statement
- GNE valuation and score
- OPAL stock overview
- OPAL income statement
- OPAL valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.