StockData

Global Mofy AI vs MicroAlgo

GMM and MLGO side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GMM and MLGO compare

Global Mofy AI grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (35.3% versus −20.3% for MicroAlgo).

MicroAlgo keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 30.2% compared with −34.5% at Global Mofy AI.

MicroAlgo scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 6 for Global Mofy AI), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGMMMLGO
Size and price
Share price$1.08$2.05
Change, 1 year−98.8%−75.4%
Change, 5 years−100.0%−100.0%
Beta (5Y)−0.95−0.97
Employees3071
StockData Score
Total score68 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score03 (better)
Health score45 (better)
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)35.3% (better)−20.3%
Net income growth (TTM)−259%149% (better)
EPS growth (TTM)–279%
Profitability
Gross margin40.2% (better)25.8%
Operating margin5.4% (better)5.3%
Net margin−34.5%30.2% (better)
FCF margin39.5% (better)4.1%
Return on equity−48.0%5.9% (better)
Return on invested capital5.9%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.07 (better)0.00
Net debt / EBITDA0.06–
Interest coverage15.4×–
Current ratio1.8916.79 (better)
Piotroski F-score36 (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions0.00%–
Held by insiders0.00%–
Short interest, % of float0.04%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.