Galaxy Digital vs Morgan Stanley
GLXY and MS side by side, both in security brokers, dealers, and flotation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GLXY and MS compare
Morgan Stanley is the larger company, worth 46 times as much as Galaxy Digital ($289B against $6.3B).
Galaxy Digital grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (24.7% versus 18.0% for Morgan Stanley).
Morgan Stanley keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 25.8% compared with −0.49% at Galaxy Digital.
Morgan Stanley pays a dividend yielding 2.3%; Galaxy Digital does not pay one.
Morgan Stanley scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 3 for Galaxy Digital), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GLXY | MS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $6.3B | $289B |
| Share price | $16.00 | $184.30 |
| Change, 1 year | −56.1% | 12.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −50.1% | 84.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.77 | 1.20 |
| Employees | 700 | 83K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 17 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 14.9× |
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 3.7× |
| P/B | 3.4× | 2.5× (better) |
| PEG | – | 0.81 |
| FCF yield | −30.2% | – |
| Fair value | – | $190.74 |
| Margin of safety | – | 3.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 24.7% (better) | 18.0% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 7.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 36.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −192% | 40.1% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 9.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | −0.49% | 25.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | −3.3% | – |
| Return on equity | −16.7% | 18.0% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.55 (better) | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.50 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 6.05 (better) | 0.26 |
| Piotroski F-score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 33.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 12 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 22.4% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 2.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 37.2% | 85.9% |
| Held by insiders | 51.5% | 24.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$14.1M (better) | −$51.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 2 |
| Short interest, % of float | 17.2% | 1.2% |
Go deeper
- GLXY stock overview
- GLXY income statement
- GLXY valuation and score
- MS stock overview
- MS income statement
- MS valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.