Global Partners LP vs World Kinect
GLP and WKC side by side, both in wholesale trade-non-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GLP and WKC compare
World Kinect is the larger company, worth 1.2 times as much as Global Partners LP ($1.8B against $1.5B).
Global Partners LP grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (29.5% versus 21.1% for World Kinect).
Global Partners LP keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.93% compared with −0.37% at World Kinect.
Both pay dividends: Global Partners LP yields 5.2% and World Kinect 2.4%.
Global Partners LP scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 10 for World Kinect), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GLP | WKC |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $1.8B |
| Share price | $44.30 | $35.65 |
| Change, 1 year | 7.0% | 46.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 88.4% | 40.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 0.81 |
| Employees | 4,700 | 4,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 10 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.1× | 0.0× (better) |
| P/B | – | 1.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.2× (better) | 52.7× |
| P/FCF | 4.5× (better) | 22.3× |
| FCF yield | 22.4% (better) | 4.5% |
| Fair value | $105.06 | $38.07 |
| Margin of safety | 57.8% (better) | 6.4% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 29.5% (better) | 21.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 17.4% (better) | 12.6% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 126% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 5.2% (better) | 2.5% |
| Operating margin | 1.5% (better) | −0.10% |
| Net margin | 0.93% (better) | −0.37% |
| FCF margin | 1.4% (better) | 0.18% |
| Return on equity | – | −11.5% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −1.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.54 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 10.87 |
| Interest coverage | – | −0.4× |
| Current ratio | 1.09 (better) | 1.04 |
| Altman Z-score | 6.19 | 6.93 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.2% (better) | 2.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 7 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 14.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | 7.1% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.2% | 9.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 49.9% | 116% |
| Held by insiders | 12.2% | 3.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $7.3M (better) | −$8.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.74% | 21.9% |
Go deeper
- GLP stock overview
- GLP income statement
- GLP valuation and score
- WKC stock overview
- WKC income statement
- WKC valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.