Global Partners LP vs Martin Midstream Partners L.P.
GLP and MMLP side by side, both in wholesale trade-non-durable goods. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GLP and MMLP compare
Global Partners LP is the larger company, worth 17 times as much as Martin Midstream Partners L.P. ($1.5B against $87.6M).
Global Partners LP grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (29.5% versus 13.2% for Martin Midstream Partners L.P.).
Global Partners LP keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.93% compared with −1.4% at Martin Midstream Partners L.P..
Both pay dividends: Global Partners LP yields 5.2% and Martin Midstream Partners L.P. 0.89%.
Global Partners LP scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 6 for Martin Midstream Partners L.P.), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GLP | MMLP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.5B | $87.6M |
| Share price | $44.30 | $2.24 |
| Change, 1 year | 7.0% | −13.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 88.4% | −21.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.74 | 0.44 |
| Employees | 4,700 | 1,723 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 16 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.2× (better) | 5.6× |
| P/FCF | 4.5× | – |
| FCF yield | 22.4% (better) | −21.3% |
| Fair value | $105.06 | $17.42 |
| Margin of safety | 57.8% | 87.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 29.5% (better) | 13.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 17.4% (better) | 1.3% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 126% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 5.2% | 50.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 1.5% | 6.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 0.93% (better) | −1.4% |
| FCF margin | 1.4% (better) | −2.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 4.69 |
| Interest coverage | – | 0.9× |
| Current ratio | 1.09 | 1.35 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 6.19 (better) | 1.91 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 5.2% (better) | 0.89% |
| Shareholder yield | 5.2% (better) | 0.89% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 49.9% | 44.3% |
| Held by insiders | 12.2% | 66.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $7.3M (better) | $75.5K |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.74% | 0.62% |
Go deeper
- GLP stock overview
- GLP income statement
- GLP valuation and score
- MMLP stock overview
- MMLP income statement
- MMLP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.