Golar LNG vs Seapeak
GLNG and SEAL.PA side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GLNG and SEAL.PA compare
Golar LNG grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (51.1% versus −10.4% for Seapeak).
Golar LNG scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 1 for Seapeak), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GLNG | SEAL.PA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $46.24 | $25.05 |
| Change, 1 year | 13.8% | −2.0% |
| Change, 5 years | 241% | −1.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.95 | 0.11 |
| Employees | 220 | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 51.1% (better) | −10.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 8.5% (better) | 1.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 29.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 98.1% |
| Operating margin | 25.3% (better) | 20.5% |
| Net margin | 16.7% | – |
| FCF margin | – | 33.2% |
| Return on equity | 3.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 2.8% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.38 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 12.19 | 2.80 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 3.0× (better) | 0.8× |
| Current ratio | 2.34 (better) | 0.42 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 83.4% | – |
| Held by insiders | 13.4% | 0.00% |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.5% | – |
Go deeper
- GLNG stock overview
- GLNG income statement
- GLNG valuation and score
- SEAL.PA stock overview
- SEAL.PA income statement
- SEAL.PA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.