StockData

Global Engine vs 3 E Network Technology

GLE and MASK side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

gleGlobal Engine$2.13−58.5% in 1 yearmask3 E Network Technology$1.80−86.3% in 1 year

How GLE and MASK compare

3 E Network Technology grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (48.5% versus −4.7% for Global Engine).

3 E Network Technology keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.7% compared with −72.8% at Global Engine.

Global Engine scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 4 for 3 E Network Technology), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGLEMASK
Size and price
Share price$2.13$1.80
Change, 1 year−58.5%−86.3%
Beta (5Y)1.43−1.46
Employees517
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)4
Valuation score00
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score5 (better)1
Dividend score00
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−4.7%48.5% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)–−126%
Profitability
Gross margin13.3%47.0% (better)
Operating margin−57.9%3.6% (better)
Net margin−72.8%−2.7% (better)
FCF margin−69.2%−43.8% (better)
Return on equity−27.2%−2.1% (better)
Return on invested capital−27.3%1.5% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage–1.1×
Current ratio2.114.23 (better)
Piotroski F-score22
Ownership
Held by institutions0.19%–
Held by insiders55.3%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.