Globus Maritime vs Pyxis Tankers
GLBS and PXS side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GLBS and PXS compare
Globus Maritime grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.8% versus −24.3% for Pyxis Tankers).
Globus Maritime scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 2 for Pyxis Tankers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GLBS | PXS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $2.91 | $5.78 |
| Change, 1 year | 143% | 109% |
| Change, 5 years | 16.9% | 113% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.68 | 0.29 |
| Employees | 25 | 10 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 26.8% (better) | −24.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 30.3% (better) | 12.4% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −84.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −500% | −79.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 10.2% | 15.2% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 5.1% |
| FCF margin | 25.7% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 2.1% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 3.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.83 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.68 | 4.23 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 0.6× | 1.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.77 | 4.72 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.1% | 2.3% |
| Held by insiders | 36.8% | 58.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.6M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.0% | 0.70% |
Go deeper
- GLBS stock overview
- GLBS income statement
- GLBS valuation and score
- PXS stock overview
- PXS income statement
- PXS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.