Globus Maritime vs Himalaya Shipping
GLBS and HSHP side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GLBS and HSHP compare
Globus Maritime grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (26.8% versus 6.7% for Himalaya Shipping).
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GLBS | HSHP |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $2.89 | $16.24 |
| Change, 1 year | 160% | 110% |
| Change, 5 years | 0.00% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| Employees | 25 | 1,000 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 26.8% (better) | 6.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 30.3% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −16.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −500% | −20.8% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 78.8% |
| Operating margin | 10.2% | 51.7% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 13.4% |
| FCF margin | 25.7% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 11.1% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 6.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | 5.68 (better) | 6.60 |
| Interest coverage | 0.6× | 1.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 2.77 (better) | 1.19 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | – | 152% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 3.1% | 48.5% |
| Held by insiders | 36.8% | 29.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $1.6M (better) | −$5.5M |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.1% | 4.8% |
Go deeper
- GLBS stock overview
- GLBS income statement
- GLBS valuation and score
- HSHP stock overview
- HSHP income statement
- HSHP valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.