Gilat Satellite Networks vs Ubiquiti
GILT and UI side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GILT and UI compare
Gilat Satellite Networks grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (47.9% versus 27.2% for Ubiquiti).
Ubiquiti keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.3% compared with 4.6% at Gilat Satellite Networks.
Ubiquiti pays a dividend yielding 0.60%; Gilat Satellite Networks does not pay one.
Ubiquiti scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 10 for Gilat Satellite Networks), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GILT | UI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $34.1B |
| Share price | $7.78 | $563.81 |
| Change, 1 year | −46.2% | −27.1% |
| Change, 5 years | −7.9% | 82.5% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.15 | 1.15 |
| Employees | 1,159 | 1,321 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 22 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 35.6× |
| P/S | – | 10.4× |
| P/B | – | 23.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 27.8× |
| P/FCF | – | 37.5× |
| PEG | – | 1.08 |
| FCF yield | – | 2.7% |
| Fair value | – | $554.02 |
| Margin of safety | – | −1.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 47.9% (better) | 27.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 22.1% (better) | 11.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −16.6% | 34.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −22.7% | 34.8% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −11.6% | 10.1% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 29.5% | 46.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 5.2% | 36.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 4.6% | 29.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | 2.0% | 27.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 4.8% | 91.1% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.7% | 120% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 (better) | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −3.34 | −0.51 |
| Current ratio | 1.97 | 2.93 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 31.85 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.60% |
| Payout ratio | – | 20.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 1 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 14.9% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 0.60% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 39.5% | 4.9% |
| Held by insiders | 21.9% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.3M | −$542K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.3% | 0.61% |
Go deeper
- GILT stock overview
- GILT income statement
- GILT valuation and score
- UI stock overview
- UI income statement
- UI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.