StockData

Gilat Satellite Networks vs Planet Labs PBC

GILT and PL side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GILT and PL compare

Gilat Satellite Networks grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (47.9% versus 44.1% for Planet Labs PBC).

Gilat Satellite Networks keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.6% compared with −95.1% at Planet Labs PBC.

Gilat Satellite Networks scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for Planet Labs PBC), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGILTPL
Size and price
Market cap–$5.2B
Share price$6.02$14.34
Change, 1 year−51.8%7.1%
Change, 5 years−16.2%25.8%
Beta (5Y)1.132.02
Employees1,1591,000
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)4
Valuation score00
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score3 (better)0
Health score5 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–13.8×
P/B–9.2×
P/FCF–211×
FCF yield–0.47%
Fair value–$3.87
Margin of safety–−270%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)47.9% (better)44.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average22.1%22.1% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−16.6%–
EPS growth (TTM)−22.7%–
EPS growth, 5Y average−11.6%–
Profitability
Gross margin29.5%55.4% (better)
Operating margin5.2% (better)−27.2%
Net margin4.6% (better)−95.1%
FCF margin2.0%6.5% (better)
Return on equity4.8% (better)−72.0%
Return on invested capital6.7%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Net debt / EBITDA−3.34–
Interest coverage–−18.7×
Current ratio1.972.84 (better)
Altman Z-score–2.62
Piotroski F-score44
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions39.5%70.5%
Held by insiders21.9%9.7%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$1.3M (better)−$43.1M
Short interest, % of float3.5%11.1%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.