StockData

Gilat Satellite Networks vs Harmonic

GILT and HLIT side by side, both in communications equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How GILT and HLIT compare

Harmonic grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (70.9% versus 47.9% for Gilat Satellite Networks).

Gilat Satellite Networks keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.6% compared with −7.0% at Harmonic.

Gilat Satellite Networks scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Harmonic), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricGILTHLIT
Size and price
Market cap–$1.1B
Share price$5.59$10.34
Change, 1 year−58.2%0.78%
Change, 5 years−22.1%−6.7%
Beta (5Y)1.111.13
Employees1,159534
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)9
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score22
Performance score3 (better)1
Health score5 (better)3
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–2.2×
P/B–3.0×
EV/EBITDA–13.8×
P/FCF–40.7×
FCF yield–2.5%
Fair value–$13.82
Margin of safety–25.2%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)47.9%70.9% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average22.1% (better)−0.99%
Net income growth (TTM)−16.6% (better)−171%
EPS growth (TTM)−22.7% (better)−174%
EPS growth, 5Y average−11.6%–
Profitability
Gross margin29.5%51.1% (better)
Operating margin5.2%14.7% (better)
Net margin4.6% (better)−7.0%
FCF margin2.0%5.5% (better)
Return on equity4.8% (better)−8.6%
Return on invested capital6.7%13.6% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00 (better)0.09
Net debt / EBITDA−3.34−1.46
Current ratio1.972.43 (better)
Altman Z-score–−0.11
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield–5.3%
Shareholder yield–5.3%
Ownership
Held by institutions39.5%86.8%
Held by insiders21.9%2.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$1.3M−$292K (better)
Short interest, % of float3.5%6.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.