Graham vs Taylor Devices
GHM and TAYD side by side, both in general industrial machinery and equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GHM and TAYD compare
Graham is the larger company, worth 5.2 times as much as Taylor Devices ($979M against $188M).
Graham grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (16.2% versus −12.5% for Taylor Devices).
Taylor Devices keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 17.5% compared with 5.0% at Graham.
Graham scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 12 for Taylor Devices), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GHM | TAYD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $979M | $188M |
| Share price | $83.42 | $58.14 |
| Change, 1 year | 37.0% | 33.3% |
| Change, 5 years | 540% | 406% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.11 | 0.59 |
| Employees | 732 | 135 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 1 | 1 |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 72.5× | – |
| P/S | 3.7× (better) | 4.8× |
| P/B | 4.9× | 2.6× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 35.0× | 27.0× (better) |
| P/FCF | 33.9× | 15.5× (better) |
| PEG | 0.31 | – |
| FCF yield | 3.0% | 6.5% (better) |
| Fair value | $59.30 | $39.50 |
| Margin of safety | −40.7% (better) | −47.2% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 16.2% (better) | −12.5% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 20.3% (better) | 13.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −2.2% (better) | −23.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −6.5% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 36.1% | 54.3% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.0% | 41.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 6.0% | 13.2% (better) |
| Net margin | 5.0% | 17.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 10.9% | 31.1% (better) |
| Return on equity | 8.2% | 9.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 11.5% | 19.7% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −2.76 | – |
| Current ratio | 1.24 | 8.66 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 4.47 | 17.53 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −5.2% | −1.0% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | −5.2% | −1.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 91.0% | 46.3% |
| Held by insiders | 6.3% | 2.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$897K |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.4% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- GHM stock overview
- GHM income statement
- GHM valuation and score
- TAYD stock overview
- TAYD income statement
- TAYD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.