GreenTree Hospitality vs Murano Global Investments
GHG and MRNO side by side, both in hotels and motels. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GHG and MRNO compare
Murano Global Investments grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (56.2% versus −18.3% for GreenTree Hospitality).
GreenTree Hospitality scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 2 for Murano Global Investments), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GHG | MRNO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1.01 | $0.185 |
| Change, 1 year | −47.7% | −92.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −88.8% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.65 | 0.77 |
| Employees | 2,287 | 1,016 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −18.3% | 56.2% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 3.4% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 51.6% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 34.9% | – |
| Operating margin | 5.2% | – |
| Net margin | 15.2% | – |
| FCF margin | 1.8% | – |
| Return on equity | 11.0% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.04 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −11.68 | 7.11 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 7.4× | – |
| Current ratio | 1.61 (better) | 0.26 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | 25.8% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 6.3% | – |
| Held by insiders | 39.5% | 86.7% |
Go deeper
- GHG stock overview
- GHG income statement
- GHG valuation and score
- MRNO stock overview
- MRNO income statement
- MRNO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.