Globalfoundries vs NXP Semiconductors
GFS and NXPI side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GFS and NXPI compare
NXP Semiconductors grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.8% versus 1.4% for Globalfoundries).
NXP Semiconductors keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 22.6% compared with 10.3% at Globalfoundries.
NXP Semiconductors pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; Globalfoundries does not pay one.
NXP Semiconductors scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 8 for Globalfoundries), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GFS | NXPI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $65.5B |
| Share price | $41.90 | $259.61 |
| Change, 1 year | 22.0% | 26.8% |
| Change, 5 years | −34.2% | 15.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.79 | 1.38 |
| Employees | 1,600 | 32K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 22.2× |
| P/S | – | 5.0× |
| P/B | – | 5.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 14.7× |
| P/FCF | – | 23.3× |
| FCF yield | – | 4.3% |
| Fair value | – | $335.91 |
| Margin of safety | – | 22.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 1.4% | 8.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.0% | 7.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 38.5% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 39.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 113% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 27.1% | 56.0% (better) |
| Operating margin | 11.6% | 32.0% (better) |
| Net margin | 10.3% | 22.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 11.5% | 21.3% (better) |
| Return on equity | 6.2% | 28.4% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 5.8% | 18.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.09 (better) | 0.96 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.04 (better) | 1.55 |
| Interest coverage | – | 8.9× |
| Current ratio | 2.48 (better) | 2.04 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.83 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.6% |
| Payout ratio | – | 34.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 22.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.91% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 2.5% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 98.2% | 95.4% |
| Held by insiders | 72.0% | 0.14% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$3.8M (better) | −$10.3M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.5% | 2.7% |
Go deeper
- GFS stock overview
- GFS income statement
- GFS valuation and score
- NXPI stock overview
- NXPI income statement
- NXPI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.