Gold Fields vs Newmont
GFI and NEM side by side, both in materials. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How GFI and NEM compare
Gold Fields grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (68.2% versus 25.2% for Newmont).
Gold Fields keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 40.8% compared with 33.4% at Newmont.
Newmont pays a dividend yielding 0.97%; Gold Fields does not pay one.
Newmont scores higher on the StockData Score (22 against 13 for Gold Fields), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | GFI | NEM |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $112B |
| Share price | $32.92 | $106.61 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.9% | 33.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 253% | 89.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.87 | 0.71 |
| Employees | 23K | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 | 22 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Health score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 13.5× |
| P/S | – | 4.4× |
| P/B | – | 3.2× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 6.8× |
| P/FCF | – | 11.5× |
| FCF yield | – | 8.7% |
| Fair value | – | $169.55 |
| Margin of safety | – | 37.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 68.2% (better) | 25.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 17.6% (better) | 14.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 187% (better) | 37.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 186% (better) | 42.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 37.2% (better) | 12.7% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 57.9% | 68.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 40.8% (better) | 33.4% |
| FCF margin | 27.1% | 37.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | 52.3% (better) | 25.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.32 | 0.14 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.15 (better) | −0.25 |
| Current ratio | – | 2.55 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.79 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 9 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.97% |
| Payout ratio | 19.8% | 12.8% |
| Years of dividend growth | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 37.6% (better) | −0.78% |
| Buyback yield | – | 3.9% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 4.9% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 18.4% | 79.3% |
| Held by insiders | 0.01% | 0.11% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $35.5K (better) | −$12.4M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
Go deeper
- GFI stock overview
- GFI income statement
- GFI valuation and score
- NEM stock overview
- NEM income statement
- NEM valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.